comments for hw #2

It was good how when you disagreed with Banach's statement you you backed it up with a thoughtful response and didn't just say..."i disagree". It was interesting how instead of using full quotes you just used a certain statement or category... for example : absolute individuals and absolute freedom, it seemed a lot more powerful then if you would have used a whole quote. 

After reading your blog it was clear that one of your main point was that you disagreed with Banach's opinion and that you thought it wasn't possable to be an absolute individual because you believe that everyone is considered family.

Your blog connects to a lot of what i have been taught in the past. I don't agree with it but in church it is taught that everyone is one and that we are all connected in some way. Everyone's opinion is different so there is no right or wrong idea about this topic.

Reading through your blog i found grammar mistakes and punctuation mistakes so just reread over your work once your done. You should expand your idea's a little more by using more evidence from the text and then explaining why you disagree with that certain quote. 

After reading "Also it depends on religion because we as people are viewed to be one big family and to help and care for each others. and basically that means that we depend on one another", it brought the whole concept of religion into the picture because different religions believe in different things so depending on what you believe in our whole perspective can be changed.

I enjoyed your blog and the new idea you brought up for me, can't wait to read your next blog.